Houston Federal Criminal Forfeiture Defense Lawyer

Federal criminal forfeiture allows the government to take certain property connected to a federal crime after a conviction. Depending on the statute, the government may seek money, bank accounts, real estate, vehicles, business interests, or other property alleged to represent criminal proceeds or to have been involved in the offense.

Forfeiture is serious because it can affect a defendant’s finances before and after sentencing. In some cases, the government may seek to restrain property before trial and may later pursue substitute assets if directly forfeitable property is unavailable. Federal forfeiture law is technical, and the rules differ depending on the underlying offense.

An experienced federal criminal defense attorney can examine whether the property is legally forfeitable, whether the government can trace it to the offense, whether substitute assets may be reached, and whether a spouse, business partner, or other third party has an ownership claim.

What Is Federal Criminal Forfeiture? How Federal Law Defines It

Federal criminal forfeiture is generally not a separate criminal charge. It is part of the sentence imposed after conviction when a federal statute authorizes forfeiture for the offense. The indictment or information must provide notice that the government intends to seek forfeiture, although the government does not necessarily have to identify every specific asset in the charging document. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(a).

Several statutes work together in federal forfeiture cases.

18 U.S.C. § 982 — Criminal Forfeiture

Section 982 is one of the primary federal criminal forfeiture statutes. It applies to specifically listed offenses and defines what property must be forfeited depending on the crime.

For example:

  • Under 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1), a person convicted of money laundering under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956 or 1957 must forfeit property “involved in” the offense and property traceable to it.
  • Under 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2), certain bank fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, and other financial offenses can result in forfeiture of proceeds the defendant obtained directly or indirectly.
  • Under 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(7), a person convicted of a federal healthcare offense must forfeit property constituting or derived from gross proceeds traceable to the offense.

The phrase “property involved in” can be broader than criminal proceeds. In money laundering cases, the government may seek property that allegedly facilitated or was used in the laundering transaction, as well as property traceable to that property.

18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) — Proceeds of Specified Unlawful Activity

Section 981 is formally a civil forfeiture statute, but § 981(a)(1)(C) is frequently used in criminal fraud cases through 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c).

Section 981(a)(1)(C) authorizes forfeiture of property that constitutes, is derived from, or is traceable to proceeds of certain federal offenses classified as “specified unlawful activity.” Those offenses can include wire fraud, mail fraud, healthcare fraud, and many other federal crimes.

28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) — Criminal Forfeiture Based on Other Forfeiture Authority

Section 2461(c) acts as a bridge between civil forfeiture authority and a criminal prosecution. When a defendant is charged with an offense for which federal law authorizes civil or criminal forfeiture, the government may include a forfeiture notice in the indictment or information.

If the defendant is convicted of the offense giving rise to forfeiture, the court orders forfeiture as part of the criminal sentence. Section 2461(c) also provides that the procedures in 21 U.S.C. § 853 generally apply to the criminal forfeiture proceeding.

21 U.S.C. § 853 — Criminal Forfeiture Procedures and Drug Cases

Section 853 directly applies to qualifying federal drug offenses. It authorizes forfeiture of:

  • Proceeds obtained from the crime;
  • Property used or intended to be used to commit or facilitate the offense; and
  • Certain interests in a continuing criminal enterprise.

Section 853 is also important outside drug cases because its procedures are incorporated into many other federal forfeiture statutes.

Those procedures can include:

  • Restraining certain property before trial;
  • Seeking substitute property when directly forfeitable assets are unavailable;
  • Determining ownership claims by third parties; and
  • Transferring forfeited property to the United States.

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2

Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2 governs much of the courtroom procedure for criminal forfeiture.

The rule addresses:

  • Notice in the indictment;
  • Determining what property is forfeitable;
  • Forfeiture money judgments;
  • Preliminary orders of forfeiture;
  • Jury determinations concerning specific property in appropriate cases;
  • Third-party claims;
  • Final orders of forfeiture; and
  • Later forfeiture of substitute property.

To obtain criminal forfeiture, the government generally must establish that the property falls within the forfeiture statute tied to the offense of conviction. The exact showing depends on the statute. Important questions often include whether the property represents criminal proceeds, was involved in or facilitated the offense, is traceable to criminal property, or qualifies as substitute property.

Penalties and Consequences

Criminal forfeiture does not itself create a separate prison sentence. Prison, fines, supervised release, and other criminal penalties come from the underlying federal offense.

Forfeiture can nevertheless be a major part of the financial consequences of a federal conviction. A court may order forfeiture of:

  • Cash;
  • Bank and investment accounts;
  • Real estate;
  • Vehicles;
  • Business assets;
  • Ownership interests;
  • Property purchased with criminal proceeds;
  • Property involved in money laundering; and
  • In appropriate cases, substitute assets.

A forfeiture order may also take the form of a money judgment representing the amount the court determines is subject to forfeiture. Rule 32.2 expressly provides for determining the amount of a forfeiture money judgment.

Forfeiture and restitution are different. Forfeiture transfers property to the government as part of the punishment for the crime. Restitution is intended to compensate victims for qualifying losses. A defendant may potentially face both in the same case.

Other consequences may include frozen or restrained assets, inability to sell or transfer property, disputes with spouses or business partners, and separate proceedings involving third parties who claim an ownership interest.

Defense Strategies

The appropriate defense depends on the underlying charge, the applicable forfeiture statute, financial records, property ownership, and the government’s tracing evidence. An attorney may explore several approaches.

Challenge the connection between the property and the crime

The government must establish the legal connection required by the applicable forfeiture statute. The defense may challenge whether the property actually represents proceeds, was involved in the offense, facilitated the crime, or is traceable to forfeitable property.

Challenge the amount of proceeds

The government’s calculation may include funds that were legitimate, unrelated to the offense, received by another person, or outside the conduct supporting conviction. Detailed financial analysis may be necessary to separate legitimate funds from allegedly forfeitable proceeds.

Challenge substitute-asset forfeiture

Federal law permits substitute property in certain circumstances when directly forfeitable property cannot be reached. An attorney may examine whether the statutory requirements for substitute-property forfeiture have actually been satisfied.

Contest pretrial restraint

When the government restrains assets before trial, the defense may examine whether the restraining order is authorized by the applicable statute and whether the specific property is properly subject to restraint.

Identify third-party ownership rights

A spouse, investor, business partner, lender, or other person may have an ownership interest separate from the defendant’s interest. Section 853 provides procedures for third parties to assert qualifying interests after a preliminary forfeiture order.

Challenge tracing

Forfeiture cases often depend heavily on bank records and financial tracing. Where legitimate and allegedly criminal funds were mixed, the defense may challenge the government’s tracing method and whether the particular asset is legally traceable to the offense.

Why Timing Matters

Forfeiture issues can begin long before sentencing. Federal prosecutors may obtain seizure warrants, restraining orders, lis pendens notices, or other court orders affecting property during the investigation or after an indictment.

Early representation allows counsel to identify which assets are at risk, preserve financial records, examine ownership documents, communicate with prosecutors, and address tracing or third-party issues before positions become fixed.

Timing also matters because criminal forfeiture has specific procedural stages. Rule 32.2 requires forfeiture to be addressed in connection with conviction and sentencing, and third parties generally must use the ancillary proceeding established by federal forfeiture law to assert ownership claims.

Forfeiture in Specific Federal Cases

Why Choose James Alston

James Alston is a Board-Certified criminal defense attorney in Houston with more than 30 years of experience. He is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and former Harris County prosecutor and represents people facing federal criminal investigations and charges.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the federal government take my house or bank account in a criminal case?

Yes, if the government establishes that the property is forfeitable under the statute tied to the offense. Whether a particular house, account, vehicle, or other asset may be forfeited depends on how the property was acquired, how it was used, and whether the government can establish the required connection to the crime.

Can the government forfeit property that was not purchased with criminal proceeds?

Sometimes. In money laundering cases, 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1) reaches property “involved in” the offense or traceable to it, which can be broader than proceeds alone. Other statutes may also permit substitute-property forfeiture when directly forfeitable assets are unavailable.

Can the government freeze my assets before trial?

Federal law permits pretrial restraint of certain forfeitable property in qualifying cases. Whether a particular asset may be restrained depends on the governing statute, the type of property, and the basis for the government’s order.

What are substitute assets?

Substitute assets are other property the government may seek when directly forfeitable property has become unavailable under circumstances covered by 21 U.S.C. § 853(p). This can become important when alleged proceeds have been transferred, spent, placed beyond the court’s jurisdiction, substantially diminished in value, or commingled with other property.

What if property belongs partly to my spouse or another person?

A third party may be able to assert an ownership interest through the ancillary proceeding provided by federal forfeiture law. The court determines whether the third party has a legally recognized interest that prevents all or part of the property from being forfeited.

Is forfeiture the same as restitution?

No. Forfeiture takes qualifying property from the defendant as part of the criminal sentence, while restitution is generally intended to compensate victims for losses caused by the offense. A federal court may impose both in the same criminal case.

Speak With a Houston Federal Criminal Forfeiture Defense Lawyer

Federal forfeiture can place homes, bank accounts, businesses, vehicles, and other assets at risk in addition to the penalties associated with the underlying criminal charge. The earlier forfeiture issues are identified, the more time the defense has to examine ownership, tracing, restraint, and substitute-property issues.

Contact the Law Offices of James Alston at 713-228-1400 for a confidential consultation about a federal criminal forfeiture matter in Houston or the Southern District of Texas.

Related Topics